EXP2 Final Submission

Theory:
A dynamic approach to architecture gives a static building the ability to transform. To produce the illusion that a significant paradigm shift has occurred to the building.

As the elevator's walls rotate, each trip up and down the elevator is unique as different perspectives are offered each time at each point in the trip, this creates a sense of value in the building's unique architecture for the students as it promotes the value of light, nature, space, and aesthetics.

The moving window situated on the studio wall facing in the roundhouse's direction promotes a range of emotions and distractions, these combined with the artwork presented and the faculties culture (Students and people seen through the window) inspire and motivate the students in the studio as they are exposed to different outlooks on architecture as they borrow creativity and attitude from those that they see and the environment presented.

Thus the building transform's the student's physical view and this links to their professional perception of architecture, this then reflects on the building itself and throughout the student's life in the faculty they will grow to appreciate different aspects of it.

Video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L3lr-91WYDU&feature=youtu.be

Dropbox:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/jd0333y6izjq20r/ARCH1101%20EXP2%20DYDUSIAK%20ROBERT%20LUMION.ls8s?dl=0

https://www.dropbox.com/s/1jv6ot2jw1et6nf/EXP2%20ARCH1101%20RobertDydusiak.skp?dl=0

Progress

Experiment 2 Week 6 REVIEWS

Sonny review:

Theory (5%): does the recombination of 3-5 key words suggest a distinctive and significant theory?                                                                                                                                                                                        80

                                                                                                                               

The axonometric diagram and sketch perspectives (25%): do these representations communicate a distinctive and significant approach the student has taken with respect to their theory, circulation and inhabitation?                  

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             80

                                                                                                                               

The custom textures (10%): do the custom textures demonstrate inquiry and experimentation with respect to ideas of movement?                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       20

                                                                                                                               

The moving elements (10%): do the moving elements demonstrate a distinctive, significant and formally evocative approach to the student’s theory?                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    0 - not started

                                                                                                                               

The architecture (50%): do the image captures and animated film demonstrate that the student has thought about the relative size of each element, what their proportions are, their orientation, what paths they facilitate, how texture and color map over their surfaces to establish a strong, conceptually driven, response to the student’s theory?                                                                                   70

                                                                                                                               

Joseph Review

Theory (5%): does the recombination of 3-5 key words suggest a distinctive and significant theory?                                                                                                                                                                                     60

                                                                                                                               

The axonometric diagram and sketch perspectives (25%): do these representations communicate a distinctive and significant approach the student has taken with respect to their theory, circulation and inhabitation?                  

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  70

                                                                                                                               

The custom textures (10%): do the custom textures demonstrate inquiry and experimentation with respect to ideas of movement?                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    80

                                                                                                                               

The moving elements (10%): do the moving elements demonstrate a distinctive, significant and formally evocative approach to the student’s theory?                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    0 - not started

                                                                                                                               

The architecture (50%): do the image captures and animated film demonstrate that the student has thought about the relative size of each element, what their proportions are, their orientation, what paths they facilitate, how texture and color map over their surfaces to establish a strong, conceptually driven, response to the student’s theory?                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       0 - not started

My own work:

                                                                                                                               

Experiment 2 Week 5 (GIFS)

Gif perspective 1:

Gif perspective 2 (opposite side):